Google is paying roughly 100 digital publishers for content that appears in its AI-generated search answers, and the amounts vary enormously from site to site, 9to5Google reported Wednesday, citing The Information. One early participant makes more than $1 million a year from the program, while some small sites have collected less than $1,000 over several months.

What Happened

According to The Information's reporting, the pilot covers publishers ranging from small blogs to mid-size sites whose material is used in AI Overviews, the AI summaries that appear at the top of many Google search results. PYMNTS, also citing the report, said AI Mode and the Gemini chatbot are part of the test as well, and that it began less than a year ago.

The payout figures span several orders of magnitude. Beyond the participant earning more than $1 million annually, a publisher that joined a few months ago has made roughly $50,000 to $60,000. Smaller sites have received less than $1,000 over several months. For many participants the money comes to less than 0.1% of what they earn from advertising.

RelatedCharacter.AI Maker Files for Chapter 11 With Google Its Largest Unsecured Creditor

Google has not explained how it sets payments. Publishers in the test have noticed a pattern, according to the report: subjects that attract strong reader interest but are less widely covered elsewhere, such as anime and gaming, appear to earn more than mainstream topics. 9to5Google said participants can see through widgets in Search Console how often AI Overviews draw on their content. Google has not announced plans to expand the pilot.

Why It Matters

For years Google's position was that search sends publishers traffic, and that traffic is the compensation. AI answers weaken that bargain because readers can get what they need without clicking through, and many publishers blame AI Overviews for falling referral traffic. A direct payment for content used in answers is a different model, closer to licensing than to referral.

The scale of the payouts suggests the pilot is not yet a replacement for lost traffic. If payments are below a tenth of a percent of ad revenue for many sites, they would not offset even a small drop in search referrals. PYMNTS reported that some larger publishers are staying out in the hope of pushing Google toward higher rates, while others are joining to learn what kind of content Google's AI values.

The apparent premium on niche subjects is also notable. If Google pays more for information its AI cannot easily find elsewhere, the model would reward specialist outlets over general news sites that cover the same stories as everyone else.

Context

Google is negotiating against a backdrop of AI licensing deals between publishers and AI developers, lawsuits over the use of news content to train models, and regulatory scrutiny of Google's search dominance. Publishers have limited leverage: blocking Google's crawlers to keep content out of AI answers can also remove it from regular search results.

What to Watch

The open questions are whether Google widens the pilot beyond about 100 sites, whether it discloses how payments are calculated, and whether participation becomes tied to how publishers' content can be used in AI features. Large publishers holding out for better terms will be a test of whether the program's rates move.